<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://localhost/app.php/feed/topic/79" />

	<title>Tools and Benchmarks for Real-Time Systems</title>
	<subtitle>ECRTS Community Forum</subtitle>
	<link href="http://localhost/index.php" />
	<updated>2016-07-04T18:39:27+01:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Tools and Benchmarks for Real-Time Systems]]></name></author>
	<id>http://localhost/app.php/feed/topic/79</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Sophie Quinton]]></name></author>
		<updated>2016-07-04T18:39:27+01:00</updated>

		<published>2016-07-04T18:39:27+01:00</published>
		<id>http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=79&amp;p=134#p134</id>
		<link href="http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=79&amp;p=134#p134"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Keynote by Robert I. Davis]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=79&amp;p=134#p134"><![CDATA[
<strong class="text-strong">Title:</strong> On the Evaluation of Schedulability Tests for Real-Time Scheduling Algorithms<br><br><strong class="text-strong">Speaker:</strong> Robert I. Davis (University of York, UK)<br><br><strong class="text-strong">Abstract: </strong> This talk discusses criteria and methods that can be used to evaluate the performance of schedulability tests for real-time scheduling algorithms.  We briefly review theoretical methods such as utilisation bounds, dominance relations, and speed-up factors, as well as empirical methods such as simulation and case studies. The talk then focusses on empirical evaluation and the generation of parameters for synthetic task sets. We discuss the need for a systematic approach, issues of bias, confounding variables and statistical confidence. A simple evaluation framework is outlined, covering how to generate task utilisation values, periods and other parameters, as well as how task set parameters can be grounded in data from benchmarks. A simple systematic approach to covering the parameter space is proposed, and different ways of presenting results considered. Finally, the talk ends with an open discussion of the benefits of having a de-facto standard approach, and how we might improve the quality of empirical evaluation in the real-time community.<br><br><strong class="text-strong">Attached slides:</strong><div class="inline-attachment"><dl class="file"><dt><span class="imageset icon_topic_attach"></span> <a class="postlink" href="http://localhost/download/file.php?id=52&amp;sid=1f2b19d775cbc3f405adc6a4c6ec4fc3">WATERS2016-Keynote.pdf</a></dt></dl></div><strong class="text-strong">Attached paper:</strong><div class="inline-attachment"><dl class="file"><dt><span class="imageset icon_topic_attach"></span> <a class="postlink" href="http://localhost/download/file.php?id=64&amp;sid=1f2b19d775cbc3f405adc6a4c6ec4fc3">WATERS2016-keynote-paper.pdf</a></dt></dl></div><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://localhost/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=55">Sophie Quinton</a> — Mon Jul 04, 2016</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
