<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://localhost/app.php/feed/topic/46" />

	<title>Tools and Benchmarks for Real-Time Systems</title>
	<subtitle>ECRTS Community Forum</subtitle>
	<link href="http://localhost/index.php" />
	<updated>2015-07-06T07:34:06+01:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Tools and Benchmarks for Real-Time Systems]]></name></author>
	<id>http://localhost/app.php/feed/topic/46</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Sophie Quinton]]></name></author>
		<updated>2015-07-06T07:34:06+01:00</updated>

		<published>2015-07-06T07:34:06+01:00</published>
		<id>http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=46&amp;p=46#p46</id>
		<link href="http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=46&amp;p=46#p46"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Which categories?]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=46&amp;p=46#p46"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br><br>I have merged the response-time analysis and schedulability analysis forums.<br><br>Best,<br>Sophie<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://localhost/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=55">Sophie Quinton</a> — Mon Jul 06, 2015</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Sophie Quinton]]></name></author>
		<updated>2015-07-02T14:28:30+01:00</updated>

		<published>2015-07-02T14:28:30+01:00</published>
		<id>http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=46&amp;p=42#p42</id>
		<link href="http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=46&amp;p=42#p42"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Which categories?]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=46&amp;p=42#p42"><![CDATA[
Hi Giuseppe,<br><br>I agree with you. The initial idea was that you can establish schedulability without computing response time bounds, but at the moment it is unclear what tool would be in the schedulability forum and not in the other one.<br><br>If nobody speaks against it before the end of the week I will merge the two forums.<br><br>Best,<br>Sophie<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://localhost/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=55">Sophie Quinton</a> — Thu Jul 02, 2015</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[glipari]]></name></author>
		<updated>2015-07-02T14:09:31+01:00</updated>

		<published>2015-07-02T14:09:31+01:00</published>
		<id>http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=46&amp;p=41#p41</id>
		<link href="http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=46&amp;p=41#p41"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Which categories?]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://localhost/viewtopic.php?t=46&amp;p=41#p41"><![CDATA[
Hi,<br><br>I see there are two forums for analysis tools:<br><br>- Response-time analysis<br>- Schedulability analysis<br><br>To me, these are just very similar, and in fact you can use pyCPA and RTC for schedulability analysis, and MAST for response time. I would suggest to join the two to avoid possible duplications. <br>What everybody else thinks about it?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="http://localhost/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=74">glipari</a> — Thu Jul 02, 2015</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
